Saturday, 27th of March 2010 |
CSU 13/2009: READER FEEDBACK/ ADDITIONAL BENEFITS OF DEWORMING / NTD FUNDING/ READER FEEDBACK
As a WHO logistics officer and acting team leader in the Eastern DRC in
1999 and 2000, I had the opportunity of working with Ellyn Ogden during one
of her visits to the region. We went to the most remote areas of Ituri in
order to ensure that potent vaccines are used for vaccination no matter how
far from Goma.
Ellyn took interest in all partners. We visited a handicapped man that
volunteered his refrigerator to keep the vaccines at required temperature.
She visited in the hospital a vaccinator who was shot by a rebel soldier.
Her words of comfort were quite welcome.
Well done, Ellyn. It was great working with you.
Emmanuel
Emmanuel TAYLOR Ph.D / JSI. USAID | DELIVER PROJECT
Resident Logistics Advisor - Liberia
+231 (0) 6 889 680
1) ADDITIONAL BENEFITS OF DEWORMING
Readers of these updates are familiar with the benefits of yearly or, more
often, twice yearly administration of broad spectrum antihelminthics like
albendazole and mebendazole, which kill most of the commonest intestinal
worms of preschool children. These are commonly given during Child Health
Days, at the same time as vitamin A and, increasingly, long life bednets
for malaria endemic areas.
In a recent PowerPoint, Antonio Montresor, of WHO HQ, has set forth much of
the scientific justification for deworming, Note especially the slides by
Noke and Mahalanabis. Apologies to all for this truncated version; the 10
MB original, with photos and graphics, would have been too large for many
recipients.
More information is at
http://www.who.int/neglected_diseases/preventive_chemotherapy/pctnewsletter/en/index.html
A word to the wise: do NOT organize schisto prevention days, using
praziquantel, before or during Child Health Days. It is impossible to avoid
confusion in the public mind between praziquantel on the one hand and
albendazole/mebendazole on the other. Finish the Child Health Days, then do
schisto prevention afterwards.
2) FUNDING FOR NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES
Writing in PLOS/NTD, at
http://medicine.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-ocument&doi=10.1371/journal.pmed.1000030
Mary Moran and colleagues review funding levels for research on neglected
tropical diseases, broadly defined.
In 2007, just over $2.5 billion was spent on R&D of new neglected tropical
disease products; however, about 80 percent of this total was spent on the
'big three,' AIDS/TB/malaria. This left not much left over for the dozen or
so less high profile diseases supported by, among others, WHO's NTD
programme.
Good reading.
BD
Are three drugs for malaria better than two?
Friday, 24th of April 2020 |
Public health Interventions and epidemic intensity during the 1918 influenza pandemic
Thursday, 16th of April 2020 |
Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine as available weapons to fight COVID-19
Tuesday, 17th of March 2020 |
Using models to shape measles control and elimination strategies in low- and middle-income countries: A review of recent applications
Monday, 17th of February 2020 |
Immunization Agenda 2030
Tuesday, 11th of February 2020 |
40924732 |
www.measlesinitiative.org www.technet21.org www.polioeradication.org www.globalhealthlearning.org www.who.int/bulletin allianceformalariaprevention.com www.malariaworld.org http://www.panafrican-med-journal.com/ |