<< Back To Home

CSU 6/2009: MDA WITH DIETHYLCARBAMAZINE PLUS ALBENDAZOLE

Friday, 6th of February 2009 Print
CSU 6/2009:  1) THE IMPACT OF REPEATED ROUNDS OF MASS DRUG ADMINISTRATION WITH
 DIETHYLCARBAMAZINE PLUS ALBENDAZOLE ON BANCROFTIAN FILARIASIS IN PAPUA NEW
 GUINEA/ 2) PREVENTIVE CHEMOTHERAPY DATABANK  3) READER FEEDBACK
 
 
 1) MDA IMPACT ON FILARIASIS
 After the WHA resolution of 1997, calling for elimination of lymphatic
 filariasis as a public health problem, there was an inflow of external
 funding in support of efforts to reduce and eliminate LF transmission.
 
 Papua New Guinea is among the most challenging environments for LF
 control, both because of the remote terrain and the thin spread of
 peripheral infrastructures. The impacts documented in this PLOS article by
 Weil and colleagues are, therefore, all the more impressive.
 
 From their text: 'MDA had dramatic effects on all filariasis
 parameters in the study area and also reduced incidence rates. Follow-up
 studies will be needed to determine whether residual infection rates in
 residents of these villages are sufficient to support sustained
 transmission by the An. punctulatus vector. Lymphatic filariasis
 elimination should be feasible in Papua New Guinea if MDA can be
 effectively delivered to endemic
 populations.'
 
 Full text at
 http://www.plosntds.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pntd.0000344
 
 2) PREVENTIVE CHEMOTHERAPY DATABANK
 PCT databank has been published on the WHO Department of Control of
 Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTD) web site. To access the PCT Databank
 please use the following link:
 http://www.who.int/neglected_diseases/preventive_chemotherapy/databank/en/index.html
 
 
 
 This tool presents historical data as reported to WHO. Information can be
 searched for by region, country, year or by disease-specific indicator.
 There are three modules covering lymphatic filariasis, soil-transmitted
 helminthiasis and schistosomiasis.
 
 
 We would also like to be informed if you have any additional data or errors
 have been made in detailing your activities.
 
 
 Thank you very much for your collaboration.
 Best regards,
 Mikhailov Alexei
 Technical Officer (Data Management)
 Preventive Chemotherapy and Transmission Control
 Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases
 World Health Organization
 
 3) READER FEEDBACK
 
 Thanks for continuing to send these regular notes on recent literature and
 events.
 
 I don't mean to spoil everyone's New Year happiness (thanks for the
 reference to the the great field epidemiologist Perry Como), but we have
 been reminded recently that catastrophic natural events can lead to global
 extinctions (comet airbursts 12,900 years ago and the Younger Dryas period
 that followed; Science 2009; 323: 94). With this in mind, your readers
 might take a few minutes to reflect on this short statement about the
 threat of the next influenza pandemic and what it might mean for people in
 developing countries.
 
 We should all be aware that the potential for using inexpensive generic
 agents to confront an influenza pandemic is well grounded in 21st century
 molecular biology. We should also recognize that its potential is being
 ignored by most influenza scientists and by the scientific and health
 policy elites who support their work (e.g., NIH, CDC, The Gates Foundation,
 the Wellcome Trust).
 
 Indonesia continues to confront WHO over H5N1 virus sharing because it
 knows it will not have access to pandemic vaccines. Three Intergovernmental
 Meetings have failed to resolve this impasse. Next Monday, 19 January, the
 Executive Board of the World Health Assembly will begin its annual meeting.
 
 The amended draft of its Medium-term Strategic Plan for 2008-2013 states,
 
 " ... an influenza pandemic causes unprecedented morbidity and mortality,
 and serious economic harm. Advanced planning for appropriate detection and
 response strategies, including containment and control strategies and
 research into the development of vaccines and medicines, is central to
 minimizing the potentially disruptive impact of a pandemic."
 
 The WHA EB is probably unaware of the possibility of using a generics
 approach for the pandemic. Yet, over the past three years I have approached
 WHO staff on four separate occasions to ask that WHO convene a technical
 consultation to review the scientific rationale and research agenda for
 generics. On each occasion my proposal has been turned down. WHO staff seem
 not to recognize that an effective generics approach would help resolve the
 impasse with Indonesia.
 
 I would welcome comments from your readers on what I've written. I would be
 happy to send them copies of the articles papers mentioned in my  attachment.
 
 I would also appreciate any suggestions they might have on how to move the
 research and policy agenda for generics forward.
 
 David Fedson
 
 David S. Fedson, MD
 57, chemin du Lavoir
 01630 Sergy Haut, France
 dfedson@wanadoo.fr
 
 Good reading.
 BD

40951888