Tuesday, 25th of January 2011 |
CSU 32/2011: EFFICACY OF RTS,S/AS01E MALARIA VACCINE
Original Text
Dr Ally Olotu MD a , John Lusingu PhD b e f, Amanda Leach MRCPCH c, Marc Lievens MSc c, Johan Vekemans PhD c, Salum Msham MD b e, Trudie Lang PhD a, Jayne Gould PhD b e, Marie-Claude Dubois MSc c, Erik Jongert PhD c, Preeti Vansadia MHS h, Terrell Carter MHS h, Patricia Njuguna MMeD a, Ken O Awuondo HND a, Anangisye Malabeja MD b e, Omar Abdul MD b e, Samwel Gesase MD b e, Neema Mturi MRCPaed a, Chris J Drakeley PhD b g, Barbara Savarese RN h, Tonya Villafana PhD j, Didier Lapierre PhD c, W Ripley Ballou MD c, Joe Cohen PhD c, Martha M Lemnge PhD b e, Norbert Peshu MBChB a, Kevin Marsh FRCP a d, Eleanor M Riley PhD b g, Lorenz von Seidlein PhD b g i k, Philip Bejon PhD a d
Summary
Background
RTS,S/AS01E is the lead candidate malaria vaccine. We recently showed efficacy against clinical falciparum malaria in 5—17 month old children, during an average of 8 months follow-up. We aimed to assess the efficacy of RTS,S/AS01E during 15 months of follow-up.
Methods
Between March, 2007, and October, 2008, we enrolled healthy children aged 5—17 months in Kilifi, Kenya, and Korogwe, Tanzania. Computer-generated block randomisation was used to randomly assign participants (1:1) to receive three doses (at month 0, 1, and 2) of either RTS,S/AS01E or human diploid-cell rabies vaccine. The primary endpoint was time to first clinical malaria episode, defined as the presence of fever (temperature ≥37·5°C) and a Plasmodium falciparum density of 2500/μL or more. Follow-up was 12 months for children from Korogwe and 15 months for children from Kilifi. Primary analysis was per protocol. In a post-hoc modelling analysis we characterised the associations between anti-circumsporozoite antibodies and protection against clinical malaria episodes. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00380393.
Findings
894 children were assigned, 447 in each treatment group. In the per-protocol analysis, 82 of 415 children in the RTS,S/AS01E group and 125 of 420 in the rabies vaccine group had first or only clinical malaria episode by 12 months, vaccine efficacy 39·2% (95% CI 19·5—54·1, p=0·0005). At 15 months follow-up, 58 of 209 children in the RTS,S/AS01E group and 85 of 206 in the rabies vaccine group had first or only clinical malaria episode, vaccine efficacy 45·8% (24·1—61·3, p=0·0004). At 12 months after the third dose, anti-circumsporozoite antibody titre data were available for 390 children in the RTS,S/AS01E group and 391 in the rabies group. A mean of 15 months (range 12—18 months) data were available for 172 children in the RTS,S/AS01E group and 155 in the rabies group. These titres at 1 month after the third dose were not associated with protection, but titres at 6·5 months were. The level of protection increased abruptly over a narrow range of antibody concentrations. The most common adverse events were pneumonia, febrile convulsion, gastroenteritis, and P falciparum malaria.
Interpretation
RTS,S/AS01E confers sustained efficacy for at least 15 months and shows promise as a potential public health intervention against childhood malaria in malaria endemic countries.
Funding
PATH Malaria Vaccine Initiative (MVI), GlaxoSmithKline.
Are three drugs for malaria better than two?
Friday, 24th of April 2020 |
Public health Interventions and epidemic intensity during the 1918 influenza pandemic
Thursday, 16th of April 2020 |
Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine as available weapons to fight COVID-19
Tuesday, 17th of March 2020 |
Using models to shape measles control and elimination strategies in low- and middle-income countries: A review of recent applications
Monday, 17th of February 2020 |
Immunization Agenda 2030
Tuesday, 11th of February 2020 |
40923350 |
www.measlesinitiative.org www.technet21.org www.polioeradication.org www.globalhealthlearning.org www.who.int/bulletin allianceformalariaprevention.com www.malariaworld.org http://www.panafrican-med-journal.com/ |