Monday, 7th of March 2016 |
Polio eradication in Nigeria, Articles from the JID Supplement
In most countries, polio eradication is a function of the government, which makes the plans, pays the vaccinators, and deals with the UN agencies at the national level. Microplanning is done at the district level. Local resource mobilization flatlines as a modest contribution compared to agency outlays. Polio eradication serves to eradicate polio, and does not contribute significantly to the control of non-EPI diseases.
In Nigeria, few of these norms were observed. Polio eradication was a joint function of the government and partners, with WHO medical officers in every state capital. WHO payments were done through banks, so that the government never saw the vaccinators´ daily indemnities. WHO dealt with the government at central, state, LGA and community levels. Microplanning went down to the household level. Moreover, environmental sampling, an adjunct to AFP surveillance in other countries where practiced, contributed importantly to the formulation of Nigerian eradication strategy. By the time of the last WPV case, local resource contributions to polio eradication exceeded half of all expenditure. Finally, GPEI in Nigeria played a decisive role in stopping the Ebola epidemic before it could spread nationwide.
The Journal of Infectious Diseases has published an open access supplement detailing all aspects of how the virus was conquered. What lessons from Nigeria can be applied to Afghanistan and Pakistan?
Strategic Engagement of Technical Surge Capacity for Intensified Polio Eradication Initiative in Nigeria, 2012-2015 http://www.childsurvival.net/?content=com_articles&artid=5679 |
Intensified Local Resource Mobilization for the Polio Eradication Initiative: The Experience of World Health Organization in Nigeria during 2008–2015 http://www.childsurvival.net/?content=com_articles&artid=5718 |
Strengthening Routine Immunization in Areas of Northern Nigeria at High Risk for Polio Transmission During 2012–2014 http://www.childsurvival.net/?content=com_articles&artid=5710 |
http://www.childsurvival.net/?content=com_articles&artid=5711 |
http://www.childsurvival.net/?content=com_articles&artid=5712 |
http://www.childsurvival.net/?content=com_articles&artid=5713 |
http://www.childsurvival.net/?content=com_articles&artid=5714 |
http://www.childsurvival.net/?content=com_articles&artid=5715 |
http://www.childsurvival.net/?content=com_articles&artid=5716 |
http://www.childsurvival.net/?content=com_articles&artid=5717 |
(C) 2010 - Kid Survival - All Rights Reserved
Are three drugs for malaria better than two?
Friday, 24th of April 2020 |
Public health Interventions and epidemic intensity during the 1918 influenza pandemic
Thursday, 16th of April 2020 |
Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine as available weapons to fight COVID-19
Tuesday, 17th of March 2020 |
Using models to shape measles control and elimination strategies in low- and middle-income countries: A review of recent applications
Monday, 17th of February 2020 |
Immunization Agenda 2030
Tuesday, 11th of February 2020 |
41152619 |
www.measlesinitiative.org www.technet21.org www.polioeradication.org www.globalhealthlearning.org www.who.int/bulletin allianceformalariaprevention.com www.malariaworld.org http://www.panafrican-med-journal.com/ |