Thursday, 10th of November 2016 |
- Author Affiliations
1. 1ANDI Centre of Excellence for Malaria Diagnosis, International Malaria Microscopy Training & RDT QA Programme & WHO/TDR/FIND Malaria Specimen Bank Site, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, PMB 12003, Lagos, Nigeria 2. 2National Malaria Elimination Program, Federal Ministry of Health, Abia Plaza, First Avenue, Off Ahmadu Bello Way, Central Business District, Abuja, Nigeria 3. 3Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA 4. 4Duke University School of Medicine, 201 Trent Drive, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. 5. 5Institute of Human Virology Nigeria, Plot 252, Herbert Macaulay Way, Central Business District, Abuja, Nigeria
ABSTRACT below; full text is at http://jcm.asm.org/content/early/2016/11/03/JCM.01431-16.full.pdf+html
Background: The need to expand malaria diagnosis alongside policy requirements for mandatory testing before treatment motivates exploration of non-invasive rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs). We report the outcome of the first cross-sectional, single-blind clinical performance evaluation of a Urine Malaria Test (UMT) for Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) malaria diagnosis in febrile patients.
Methods: Matched urine and fingerprick blood from participants ≥2 years with fever (axillary temperature ≥37.5°C) or history of fever in the preceding 48 hours were tested with UMT and microscopy (as gold standard). BinaxNOW® (Pf/Pan) blood RDT was done to assess relative performance. Urinalysis and Rheumatoid Factor (RF) tests were conducted to evaluate possible interference. Diagnostic performance characteristics were computed at 95% CI.
Results: Of 1,800 participants screened, 1,691 were enrolled; 566 (34%) were febrile, 1,125 (66%) afebrile; test positivity among enrolled participants: 341 (20%) by microscopy, 419 (25%) UMT, 676 (40%) BinaxNow Pf and 368 (22%) BinaxNow Pan. UMT sensitivity among febrile patients (for whom the test is indicated) was 85% and specificity 84%. Among febrile children ≤5 years, UMT sensitivity was 93%, specificity 83%. Area under receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUC) of UMT (0.84) was not significantly different from Binax Pf (0.86) or Binax Pan (0.87), indicating that the tests do not differ in overall performance. Gender, seasons, and RF did not impact UMT performance. Leukocytes, hematuria and urobilinogen concentration in urine were associated with lower UMT specificity.
Conclusion: UMT performance was comparable to BinaxNOW Pf/Pan tests, and is a promising tool to expand malaria testing in public and private healthcare settings where there are challenges to blood-based malaria diagnosis testing.
Are three drugs for malaria better than two?
Friday, 24th of April 2020 |
Public health Interventions and epidemic intensity during the 1918 influenza pandemic
Thursday, 16th of April 2020 |
Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine as available weapons to fight COVID-19
Tuesday, 17th of March 2020 |
Using models to shape measles control and elimination strategies in low- and middle-income countries: A review of recent applications
Monday, 17th of February 2020 |
Immunization Agenda 2030
Tuesday, 11th of February 2020 |
40956035 |
www.measlesinitiative.org www.technet21.org www.polioeradication.org www.globalhealthlearning.org www.who.int/bulletin allianceformalariaprevention.com www.malariaworld.org http://www.panafrican-med-journal.com/ |