<< Back To Home

Assessing the Impact of U.S. Food Assistance Delivery Policies on Child Mortality in Northern Kenya

Tuesday, 27th of December 2016 Print

PLoS One. 2016 Dec 20;11(12):e0168432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168432. eCollection 2016.

Assessing the Impact of U.S. Food Assistance Delivery Policies on Child Mortality in Northern Kenya

Nikulkov A1Barrett CB2Mude AG3Wein LM1.

  • 1Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, California, Unites States of America.
  • 2Charles H. Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
  • 3International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.

Abstract below; full text is at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0168432

 

The U.S. is the main country in the world that delivers its food assistance primarily via transoceanic shipments of commodity-based in-kind food. This approach is costlier and less timely than cash-based assistance, which includes cash transfers, food vouchers, and local and regional procurement, where food is bought in or nearby the recipient country. The U.S.s approach is exacerbated by a requirement that half of its transoceanic food shipments need to be sent on U.S.-flag vessels. We estimate the effect of these U.S. food assistance distribution policies on child mortality in northern Kenya by formulating and optimizing a supply chain model. In our model, monthly orders of transoceanic shipments and cash-based interventions are chosen to minimize child mortality subject to an annual budget constraint and to policy constraints on the allowable proportions of cash-based interventions and non-US-flag shipments. By varying the restrictiveness of these policy constraints, we assess the impact of possible changes in U.S. food aid policies on child mortality. The model includes an existing regression model that uses household survey data and geospatial data to forecast the mean mid-upper-arm circumference Z scores among children in a community, and allows food assistance to increase Z scores, and Z scores to influence mortality rates. We find that cash-based interventions are a much more powerful policy lever than the U.S.-flag vessel requirement: switching to cash-based interventions reduces child mortality from 4.4% to 3.7% (a 16.2% relative reduction) in our model, whereas eliminating the U.S.-flag vessel restriction without increasing the use of cash-based interventions generates a relative reduction in childmortality of only 1.1%. The great majority of the gains achieved by cash-based interventions are due to their reduced cost, not their reduced delivery lead times; i.e., the reduction of shipping expenses allows for more food to be delivered, which reduces child mortality.

 

40923620