<< Back To Home


Saturday, 7th of May 2011 Print

‘[M]ass media campaigns can produce positive changes or prevent negative changes in health-related behaviours across large populations.’




Best read at http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(10)60809-4/fulltext


Good reading. For those focusing on child survival, the relevant section is reproduced here.




‘Child survival

‘In many low-income countries, a substantial portion of premature mortality and associated morbidity occurs between birth and age 5 years. Major causes of poor child survival include inadequate treatment of dehydration resulting from diarrhoea, non-vaccination for preventable diseases, and failure to breastfeed exclusively and for sufficient time.71, 72 Each of these causes has been the target of mass media campaigns, with mixed evidence for success.

One review found four of six childhood vaccination programmes that used mass media achieved substantial improvements in vaccine use, and the effects were incremental with increasing exposure to the campaign.73, 74 One cost-effectiveness analysis in Bangladesh attributed increasing use of immunisation services to national campaign exposure.75 A later review of vaccination interventions found no additional examples of mass media campaigns alone.76 Rather, mass media was a strategy widely used in multicomponent vaccination campaigns worldwide, and substantial improvements in childhood vaccination were repeatedly recorded. As with other campaigns, effects cannot be specifically attributed to the mass media campaign component.77


‘In a review of five diarrhoea treatment programmes that used mass media to promote home-mixed or premixed rehydration solutions, three were associated with increased adoption of rehydration solution.73


‘Although mass media programmes to promote breastfeeding have been mounted, reviews from the 1990s onwards seem scarce or non-existent. Two studies—one from Jordan in the late 1980s78 and one from Armenia79, 80—show positive effects.


‘In countries where mortality from sudden infant death syndrome has been monitored, death rates have sharply declined, attributed mainly to a change in the position in which infants are put down to sleep (on their backs). National campaigns with strong mass media components have been part of distribution of this message and have been aimed at members of the public and medical practitioners. Sharp reductions in prone sleeping have accompanied reductions in deaths from sudden infant death syndrome of well over 50%.81


‘A reduction in the use of children's aspirin, owing to this drug's association with Reye's syndrome, might partly indicate an indirect, non-campaign-led mass media effect. In the USA the media coverage of the public debate over risks of children's aspirin consumption was associated with an abrupt decline in use of and in incidence of the disease. The introduction of warnings on aspirin bottle labels was associated with a further smaller but still notable drop in the disease until it almost disappeared.82





The Lancet, Volume 376, Issue 9748, Pages 1261 - 1271, 9 October 2010

Published Online: 07 October 2010

Use of mass media campaigns to change health behaviour

Original Text

Prof Melanie A Wakefield PhD a , Prof Barbara Loken PhD b, Prof Robert C Hornik PhD c 


Mass media campaigns are widely used to expose high proportions of large populations to messages through routine uses of existing media, such as television, radio, and newspapers. Exposure to such messages is, therefore, generally passive. Such campaigns are frequently competing with factors, such as pervasive product marketing, powerful social norms, and behaviours driven by addiction or habit. In this Review we discuss the outcomes of mass media campaigns in the context of various health-risk behaviours (eg, use of tobacco, alcohol, and other drugs, heart disease risk factors, sex-related behaviours, road safety, cancer screening and prevention, child survival, and organ or blood donation). We conclude that mass media campaigns can produce positive changes or prevent negative changes in health-related behaviours across large populations. We assess what contributes to these outcomes, such as concurrent availability of required services and products, availability of community-based programmes, and policies that support behaviour change. Finally, we propose areas for improvement, such as investment in longer better-funded campaigns to achieve adequate population exposure to media messages.


Over the past few decades, media campaigns have been used in an attempt to affect various health behaviours in mass populations. Such campaigns have most notably been aimed at tobacco use and heart-disease prevention, but have also addressed alcohol and illicit drug use, cancer screening and prevention, sex-related behaviours, child survival, and many other health-related issues. Typical campaigns have placed messages in media that reach large audiences, most frequently via television or radio, but also outdoor media, such as billboards and posters, and print media, such as magazines and newspapers. Exposure to such messages is generally passive, resulting from an incidental effect of routine use of media. Some campaigns incorporate new technologies (eg, the internet, mobile phones and personal digital assistants), but recipients have so far generally been required to actively choose to seek information, for example by clicking on a web link, and discussion of these methods is not included in this Review.

Media campaigns can be of short duration or may extend over long periods. They may stand alone or be linked to other organised programme components, such as clinical or institutional outreach and easy access to newly available or existing products or services, or may complement policy changes. Multiple methods of dissemination might be used if health campaigns are part of broader social marketing programmes.1


The great promise of mass media campaigns lies in their ability to disseminate well defined behaviourally focused messages to large audiences repeatedly, over time, in an incidental manner, and at a low cost per head. As we discuss in this Review, however, that promise has been inconsistently realised: campaign messages can fall short and even backfire; exposure of audiences to the message might not meet expectations, hindered by inadequate funding, the increasingly fractured and cluttered media environment, use of inappropriate or poorly researched format (eg, boring factual messages or age-inappropriate content), or a combination of these features; homogeneous messages might not be persuasive to heterogeneous audiences; and campaigns might address behaviours that audiences lack the resources to change.

Direct and indirect methods to affect behaviour change

Mass media campaigns can work through direct and indirect pathways to change the behaviour of whole populations.2 Many campaigns aim to directly affect individual recipients by invoking cognitive or emotional responses. Such programmes are intended to affect decision-making processes at the individual level. Anticipated outcomes include the removal or lowering of obstacles to change, helping people to adopt healthy or recognise unhealthy social norms, and to associate valued emotions with achieving change. These changes strengthen intentions to alter and increase the likelihood of achieving new behaviours.3 For instance, an antismoking campaign might emphasise risks of smoking and benefits of quitting, provide a telephone number for a support line, remind smokers of positive social norms in relation to quitting, associate quitting with positive self-regard, or a combination of these features.

Behaviour change might also be achieved through indirect routes. First, mass media messages can set an agenda for and increase the frequency, depth, or both, of interpersonal discussion about a particular health issue within an individual's social network, which, in combination with individual exposure to messages, might reinforce (or undermine) specific changes in behaviour. Second, since mass media messages reach large audiences, changes in behaviour that become norms within an individual's social network might influence that person's decisions without them having been directly exposed to or initially persuaded by the campaign. For example, after viewing televised antismoking campaign messages, several members of a social group might be prompted to form a support group to help them stop smoking. Another individual who has not seen the television campaign could decide to join the support group and change his or her own behaviour. Finally, mass media campaigns can prompt public discussion of health issues and lead to changes in public policy, resulting in constraints on individuals' behaviour and thereby change. For example, a campaign discouraging smoking because of its second-hand effects on non-smokers might not persuade smokers to quit, but it might increase public support for a new policy that restricts smoking in specific places, which might have the secondary effect of persuading smokers to quit.

Evidence for health behaviour change

We discuss a range of media campaigns, from constrained experimental programmes with complex research apparatus funded specifically to test the promise of public communication, such as the Stanford Heart Disease Prevention Program,4, 5 to campaigns mounted as large-scale interventions on a regional or national scale, not operationally constrained by the need for outcome assessment, but to which analysis was later applied, such as the US National Youth Antidrug Media Campaign.6 These distinctions matter because the strength of the claims of causality is affected by the campaign design. For example, campaigns designed to maximise scale and operational success but that do not carefully assess outcomes might be expected to make weak claims compared with those that include carefully planned experimental assessments. Large-scale media campaigns do, however, have higher population exposure and can exploit the indirect pathways that can increase overall population response to campaigns. Careful experimental designs are more often used to assess only the direct effects of small-scale campaigns, which might not provide the potential for maximum effectiveness.7

Tobacco, alcohol, and illicit drugs

One in three long-term tobacco users die prematurely, largely from cardiovascular and respiratory diseases and cancer. Without intervention, 1 billion premature deaths globally are predicted to be related to tobacco by the end of this century.8 Tobacco use is also a major contributor to social inequalities in mortality in many populations worldwide.9 Far more studies have been done to assess the effects of media campaigns on tobacco use than on any other health-related issue and, consequently, the evidence for benefit is strong (table). Between the 1970s and mid-1990s, the studies were controlled field experiments forming part of research demonstration projects, whereas from the mid-1990s onwards, large-scale media campaigns have been assessed as key components of state and national tobacco control programmes.

TableTable image

Summary of reviews of mass media campaign features and effects on behaviour, by health topic*

Comprehensive reviews of controlled field experiments and population studies show that mass media campaigns were associated with a decline in young people starting smoking10 and with an increase in the number of adults stopping.10, 11 Smoking prevention in young people seems to have been more likely when mass media efforts were combined with programmes in schools, the community, or both.10 Many population studies have documented reductions in adult smoking prevalence when mass media campaigns have been combined with other tobacco control strategies, such as increases in tobacco taxation or smoke-free policies.10, 11 In the absence of formal control groups not exposed to mass media campaigns, however, it is difficult to separate the effects of the different strategies. Some studies have used time series analyses12 or natural experiment designs that exploit variation in degree of exposure to the media campaign and adjust for exposure to other tobacco control policies, and have found beneficial independent effects of campaigns.13, 14

The achievement of adequate exposure to media campaigns seems important for reducing population tobacco use; withdrawal of media campaigns has been associated with a decline in beneficial effects.10, 12, 15, 16 This outcome is unsurprising while influences that promote tobacco use remain (eg, marketing and the addictive nature of tobacco).


Most evidence has been generated from studies in high-income countries because the highest number of campaigns have been done there and research capacity is substantial there. Evidence is mixed on the ability of mass media campaigns to redress the disparities in smoking prevalence between subgroups with high and low socioeconomic status.17 One cohort study has suggested that high exposure to antitobacco campaigns that elicit negative emotions, such as fear, disgust, and sadness, promotes increased cessation rates in lower socioeconomic populations.14 This finding is consistent with evidence in many population subgroups of the positive effects of antitobacco campaigns that use negatively emotive advertising messages.10 For example, media campaigns that graphically link smoking to serious health damage to motivate adult smoking cessation (figure) have also been associated with prevention of smoking uptake among young people.10 This outcome might be an indirect consequence of reductions in adult (eg, parental) smoking attributable to campaigns, which exerts a protective effect on youth uptake.18 Direct effects of such campaigns on young people have, however, also been suggested.10, 19 A future challenge for media campaigns related to tobacco control is to ensure their evidence-based application in low-income and middle-income countries, which have infrequently received such programmes, and in groups with low socioeconomic status in high-income countries.


Figure Full-size image (118K) Download to PowerPoint

Images from a television advertisement in Australia's National Tobacco Campaign

Smoking is linked graphically to arterial damage and the caption “Every Cigarette Is Doing You Damage” was used. The campaign was associated with a decline in adult smoking rates.12 Reproduced courtesy of the Department of Health and Ageing, National Tobacco Campaign.

During the late 1990s, several tobacco companies began to broadcast mass media campaigns internationally to advocate that young people should not smoke. Studies of forced (non-incidental) exposure, in which young people had to watch then recall and appraise advertisements, have concluded that these messages were appraised poorly by the target audience.10 The Philip Morris tobacco company in the USA also broadcast campaigns encouraging parents to talk with their children about tobacco use. Population-based studies found high exposure to the industry's youth-directed campaign was associated with strengthening intention to smoke in the future,20, 21 whereas high exposure to the parent-directed campaigns strengthened intentions to smoke in the future, lowered perception of harm from smoking, and increased the risk of current smoking behaviour.21 A theory for these outcomes is that few reasons beyond simply being a teenager were offered as to why young people should not smoke. By giving a subtle message that smoking is an adult activity, tobacco can seem like a forbidden fruit and attractiveness can increase.


Misuse of alcohol contributes to around 4% of the global burden of ill health and premature death, principally from alcohol-use disorders, cancer, cardiovascular disease, liver cirrhosis, and injury.22 With the exception of mass media campaigns to reduce drink driving, campaigns to lessen alcohol intake have had little success.23, 24 Most have been targeted towards young people,23, 25, 26 but the potential effects have generally been overshadowed by widespread unrestricted alcohol marketing strategies and the view of drinking as a social norm. Safe drinking campaigns sponsored by alcohol companies have been ineffective in changing drinking behaviour, because the messages are viewed as ambiguous by recipients.27, 28 No assessments have been conducted of whether the publicising of alcohol drinking guidelines affects alcohol-related harm.25


Little peer-reviewed research is available on the effects of mass media campaigns to change behaviours related to illicit drug use; nearly all work has been undertaken in the USA. One study found positive effects of a campaign that ran from 1987 to 1990 and addressed use of marijuana and crack cocaine by young people.29 By contrast, another study found the effects to be overstated for a campaign that ran in Montana, USA, against methamphetamine use.30 Between 1998 and 2004, the US Congress spent nearly US$1 billion on a national antidrug media campaign aimed at young people aged 9—18 years, their parents, and other influential adults. The campaign used television and radio advertising, accompanied by other media and community programmes, to provide education, with the goals of preventing initiation of marijuana use and persuading occasional users to stop. Messages directed at parents encouraged them to talk with their children about drugs and to closely supervise and monitor their behaviour.


Although some localised time-limited studies showed positive effects among young people who require substantial novelty and stimulation (termed high-sensation young)31 and those who also received school-based drug prevention information,32 a comprehensive national assessment showed that the campaign did not positively affect attitudes towards or behaviour related to marijuana use among young people.5 Indeed, some evidence suggested that greater exposure would have increased intention to use marijuana, possibly because the underlying message of the campaign was that marijuana use was commonplace and thus normal.5 Among parents, the campaign had favourable effects in terms of their attitudes towards and behaviour in relation to talking with children about drugs. No improvement was reported, however, in attitudes towards or monitoring of their children's behaviour.33 The evidence for the success of campaigns focusing on illicit drug use is inconsistent.

Nutrition, activity, and prevention of heart disease

Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death worldwide and is a major contributor to health-care costs in developed countries. In addition to tobacco use, risk factors include high blood pressure, high blood cholesterol concentrations, poor nutrition, physical inactivity, and obesity.34, 35 Whereas rates of heart disease and stroke have lessened since the 1950s, those of obesity have increased strikingly among adults and particularly among children in high-income countries.35—38


In the 1970s and 1980s, large-scale community-based public communication interventions aimed at preventing cardiovascular disease, including the North Karelia Project in Finland, and the Stanford Heart Disease Prevention Program and the Minnesota Heart Health Program in the USA, were among the first to be formally assessed for effectiveness.39 Smaller-scale cardiovascular disease prevention programmes followed in the mid-1980s and 1990s. In aggregate, these programmes yielded high awareness and improvements in risk-reducing behaviours, such as changes to diet and increases in physical activity. Cross-sectional independent sample outcome effects, particularly on overall risk for cardiovascular disease, however, were short-term, small in size, and similar in magnitude to secular declines in communities not exposed to mass media campaigns.40 Researchers have argued convincingly, though, that large-scale, uncontrolled, national campaigns with large mass media components, such as the National High Blood Pressure Education Program and the National Cholesterol Education Program in the USA, contributed to these substantial secular declines in blood pressure, blood cholesterol concentrations, or both.41

Since the mid-1980s, the scale of mass media campaigns related to heart health has decreased, whereas the size of those directed towards improving nutrition, increasing physical activity, or both, has increased. Before 1990, campaigns related to diet frequently focused on reducing fat intake, but the results in terms of improving food choices seem to have been mixed.35 Later media campaigns focused on increasing consumption of fruit, vegetables and low-fat milk, and were deemed more successful, especially when people were provided with access to healthy foods or had health disorders for which changes in diet would be beneficial.34, 35, 42, 43 Campaigns aimed at increasing low-fat-milk consumption have also motivated governmental policy changes.44 The introduction of signs and labels providing nutritional information at the point of purchase in restaurants, grocery stores, and vending machines, have also increased the likelihood of people selecting healthy food.35


Campaigns with mass media components aimed at changing physical activity behaviours have yielded short-term increases in physical activity, mainly in highly motivated individuals.45—47 Success has been seen with community-wide walking campaigns targeting adults, especially older adults (eg, >50 years),48, 49 and the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention's VERB campaign, which targeted children aged 9—13 years.36, 46 The latter campaign used commercial marketing techniques and had achieved population-level changes at year 2, with evidence being reported for an exposure-response relation.36, 46 Small-scale interventions that have used motivational posters to encourage use of stairs instead of elevators have also changed behavior.35, 47 Mass media programmes for prevention of childhood obesity have shown encouraging results, with improvements in body-mass index Z scores being associated with the exposure to the campaigns.37, 38

Assessment of campaigns to promote nutrition and physical activity, like those promoting tobacco control, shows that while short-term changes can be achieved, sustained effects are difficult to maintain after campaigns end.34, 38, 45, 46, 49, 50 Competing environmental factors, such as easy access to and marketing of energy-dense food,51 the complexity of recommendations for nutritional and physical activity behaviour in different population subgroups,50 and changes over time in recommendations made by health educators are notable obstacles to achieving longer-term population-level changes.46 Sufficient exposure to campaign messages,52 including in high-risk and underserved populations,41, 46, 47 is also a concern. Finally, almost all assessed mass media campaigns have included multiple programme components (eg, other community, school, and worksite interventions) and, therefore, the effects of mass media campaigns are difficult to isolate.41, 45, 47

Birth-rate reduction and prevention of HIV infection

Reductions in birth rates and prevention of HIV infection require changes in human behaviour on a large scale. Unsurprisingly, therefore, both these issues have been continuing focuses for mass media campaigns. Those intended to encourage family planning have been particularly important in low-income countries,53 whereas those aimed at preventing HIV infection have been relevant in low-income and high-income countries.54, 55

The transition from high to low birth rates has been argued to require a climate of opinion “supportive of modern contraceptive use and the idea of smaller family sizes”.56 This opinion is supported by substantial evidence that the spread of information through mass media, along with efforts to promote family planning, is associated with adoption of contraception.57, 58 Positive outcomes can be shown whether comparisons are made across geographic areas, over time within geographic areas, or between individuals.57 For example, Cleland and Ali58 have noted a sharp growth in the use of condoms for protection against pregnancy among young women across Africa (from 5% to 18% between 1993 and 2001), which they attribute to HIV-related condom promotion campaigns. Although these temporal or cross-sectional associations are noteworthy and, in some cases, are independent of potential confounders, separation of the effects of exposure to modern values through ordinary media content from effects of exposure to specific procontraceptive campaign content is not always clear-cut.

Evidence from discrete projects complements that from population-level and aggregated studies. Effective family planning communication strategies have included the embedding of pro-family-planning messages in entertainment programmes, particularly in a soap opera format, social marketing with expanded distribution of family planning devices, and focused promotional advertising. The greatest short-term increases in demand have been reported for people who were exposed to campaign messages and were already considering use; the effects in people who were not previously committed to use are less convincing.57


Programmes for prevention of HIV infection have received substantial funding worldwide, and mass media campaigns have been major components of those programmes. Behavioural targets have included uptake of HIV testing, use of condoms, and lowering the number of sex partners. Bertrand and colleagues54 noted mixed results for mass media interventions in low-income countries: a few studies yielded small to moderate effects, but others achieved no change. Wellings55 summarised a series of European AIDS campaigns with major mass media components run in the early 1990s. She found that campaign activity and trends in the proportions of people with casual sexual partners who used condoms increased linearly, especially in countries with more vigorous campaigns, but there was no effect on the number of sex partners. Noar and co-workers59 built on an earlier review60 and judged that only ten of 34 identified campaigns had robust quality assessment components, but of these eight showed significant effects on behaviour.


Of the campaigns aimed at reducing birth and HIV infection rates, reviews have shown consistently that discrete mass media programmes can affect behaviour.

Cancer screening and prevention

Screening of asymptomatic individuals for cervical, breast, and colorectal cancers is recommended for early detection.61 Mass media campaigns to encourage women to have Papanicolaou (Pap) smears and undergo screening mammography have been run in many high-income nations since the early 1990s. Initial experience, predominantly from Australia and the USA, suggested that mass media campaigns supported by tailored reminder letters prompted short-term increases in Pap-smear uptake, especially when there was good availability of screening services.62, 63 Later research indicated that short-duration screening programmes that offered easy access to screening services, used reminder letters, and specifically included television broadcast components were associated with short-term population-wide increases in attendance for Pap smears,64 including in ethnic minority populations65 and those of low socioeconomic status.66 Likewise in the case of mammography, use of mass media campaigns and reminder letters in areas where screening was already organised and available led to increases in uptake.65 Snyder and colleagues42 did a meta-analysis of US-based campaigns and the findings suggested a small but significant effect. Mass media campaigns without organised screening services, however, have produced little or no detectable increases in use of cervical cancer screening;61, 62 no such studies have been done for breast or colorectal cancer screening.61


Skin cancer is caused mainly by overexposure to ultraviolet radiation in sunlight.67, 68 Mass media campaigns aimed at prevention of skin cancer have concentrated on reducing patterns of sun exposure, mainly in fair-skinned populations. The types of behaviours most frequently recommended have been avoidance of direct exposure in high ultraviolet periods and the wearing of protective clothing and sunscreen products. A systematic review showed insufficient evidence of an association between mass media campaigns—alone or accompanied by comprehensive community programmes—and changes in sun-exposure behaviours.67 A study from Australia that assessed sun protection attitudes and behaviours for 15 years in the presence of variable amounts of media campaign exposure (SunSmart), however, has provided convincing evidence of improvements in attitudes and behaviour in the presence of skin cancer prevention media campaigns.69 Furthermore, reductions in the incidence of melanoma have been observed, especially among young people, over the decades of this media campaign.70 The researchers of this Australian study advocate as crucial the need for sustained community-wide organised efforts that include mass media to maintain the positive preventive effects and counter competing forces that promote sunbathing and tanning, such as fashion trends and solarium marketing.70

Child survival

In many low-income countries, a substantial portion of premature mortality and associated morbidity occurs between birth and age 5 years. Major causes of poor child survival include inadequate treatment of dehydration resulting from diarrhoea, non-vaccination for preventable diseases, and failure to breastfeed exclusively and for sufficient time.71, 72 Each of these causes has been the target of mass media campaigns, with mixed evidence for success.

One review found four of six childhood vaccination programmes that used mass media achieved substantial improvements in vaccine use, and the effects were incremental with increasing exposure to the campaign.73, 74 One cost-effectiveness analysis in Bangladesh attributed increasing use of immunisation services to national campaign exposure.75 A later review of vaccination interventions found no additional examples of mass media campaigns alone.76 Rather, mass media was a strategy widely used in multicomponent vaccination campaigns worldwide, and substantial improvements in childhood vaccination were repeatedly recorded. As with other campaigns, effects cannot be specifically attributed to the mass media campaign component.77


In a review of five diarrhoea treatment programmes that used mass media to promote home-mixed or premixed rehydration solutions, three were associated with increased adoption of rehydration solution.73


Although mass media programmes to promote breastfeeding have been mounted, reviews from the 1990s onwards seem scarce or non-existent. Two studies—one from Jordan in the late 1980s78 and one from Armenia79, 80—show positive effects.


In countries where mortality from sudden infant death syndrome has been monitored, death rates have sharply declined, attributed mainly to a change in the position in which infants are put down to sleep (on their backs). National campaigns with strong mass media components have been part of distribution of this message and have been aimed at members of the public and medical practitioners. Sharp reductions in prone sleeping have accompanied reductions in deaths from sudden infant death syndrome of well over 50%.81


A reduction in the use of children's aspirin, owing to this drug's association with Reye's syndrome, might partly indicate an indirect, non-campaign-led mass media effect. In the USA the media coverage of the public debate over risks of children's aspirin consumption was associated with an abrupt decline in use of and in incidence of the disease. The introduction of warnings on aspirin bottle labels was associated with a further smaller but still notable drop in the disease until it almost disappeared.82

Other health behaviours

Road safety mass media campaigns have promoted reductions in the frequency of road accidents and deaths through increases in uses of seat belts, booster seats for children, and helmets for bicyclists, skateboarders, and motorcyclists, and reductions in speeding, driver fatigue, and drink driving. The average associated decline in vehicle crashes has been estimated to be at least 7%,83 and of alcohol-impaired driving to be 13%.84 Results of designated driver programmes have been less conclusive.85 The most notable road safety campaigns have promoted seat belt use.86 The Click It or Ticket programme in North Carolina, USA, was associated with an increase in seat belt use from 63% to 80% and lowered rates of highway deaths, and became a model for other state and national programmes.87 A version in Washington state, USA, reported gains from 83% up to 95% of seat belt use.88 Law enforcement and repeated cycles of short-term mass media exposure seem, therefore, to have been important components of road safety campaign effectiveness.83, 84, 87, 88


The need for organ donation and transplantation is increasing worldwide.89, 90 Organ donation campaigns have been infrequent, and the few assessed have had mixed results. Public misconceptions and mistrust of physician's end-of-life decisions have been cited as key barriers to change.90 News media surrounding the World Transplant Games Federation international events seems to be associated with increased organ donations in the cities where events were held, but increases were not sustained after media exposure dropped.89

Although few data for blood donation campaigns have been published, a few studies report sizeable increases in blood donors in association with mass media campaigns. For example, during China's national campaign to promote safe donation, which used celebrities and a patriotic message, the number of voluntary blood donors rose from 55 to 96 320 in one city between 1993 and 2001.91 In Ghana, analysis of a low-cost radio campaign that promoted voluntary blood donation from 2003 to 2006 showed an associated high response from young male donors attending for repeat donation who had not previously done so.92

According to reports from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and WHO, youth violence, intimate partner violence, child maltreatment (sexual and physical abuse), and mental disorders are preventable behaviours that have negative effects on national rates of injuries and deaths, and on physical health conditions.93—95 Researchers have begun to call for the abandonment of victim-perpetrator models and instead advocating mass media interventions to redress risk factors, such as skill deficits and parental dysfunctions.94, 95 As yet, campaign effectiveness is unclear.95 Examples of promising programmes with mass media components include a campaign for professional training that lowered rates of child maltreatment outcomes,96 an intimate partner violence programme for which increased reported bystander responses were reported,97 and a campaign that was associated with reduced rates of bullying in schools among children aged 12—14 years.94 A review of suicide prevention campaigns undertaken in several countries found improvements in attitudes about causes and treatment of depression, but outcomes, such as the rate of suicide acts, did not change.98


Mass media campaigns to reduce delays in prehospital response for heart attacks and other emergency health disorders have been related to increased understanding of symptoms but no sustained lowering of response times or mortality rates.99 Researchers have called for extension of campaign duration to increase exposure, and strengthening of the messages by concurrently offering community programmes, targeting of high-risk and rural populations, and investigation of patients' barriers to action.99


Mass media campaigns can directly and indirectly produce positive changes or prevent negative changes in health-related behaviours across large populations. Our careful reading of topic-specific individual studies and more-general mass media reviews,42, 100, 101 and our collective experience in campaign research and evaluation across health behaviours has led us to the following conclusions about the conditions under which media campaigns work.

The likelihood of success is substantially increased by the application of multiple interventions102 and when the target behaviour is one-off or episodic (eg, screening, vaccination, children's aspirin use) rather than habitual or ongoing (eg, food choices, sun exposure, physical activity). Concurrent availability of and access to key services and products are crucial to persuade individuals motivated by media messages to act on them. The creation of policies that support opportunities to change provides additional motivation for change, whereas policy enforcement can discourage unhealthy or unsafe behaviours. Public relations or media advocacy campaigns that shape the treatment of a public health issue by news and entertainment media also represent a promising complementary strategy to conventional media campaigns.103

Various hindrances to the success of mass media campaigns exist. Pervasive marketing for competing products or with opposing messages, the power of social norms, and the drive of addiction frequently mean that positive campaign outcomes are not sustained. Greater and longer-term investment will be required to extend effects. The increasingly fractured and cluttered media environment poses challenges to achieving adequate exposure to planned media messages, rather than making wide exposure easier. Careful planning and testing of campaign content and format with target audiences are, therefore, crucial (panel).98, 102



Policy recommendations for national governments, practitioners and professional bodies

Mass media campaigns should be included as key components of comprehensive approaches to improving population health behaviours

Sufficient funding must be secured to enable frequent and widespread exposure to campaign messages continuously over time, especially for ongoing behaviours

Adequate access to promoted services and products must be ensured

Changes in health behaviour might be maximised by complementary policy decisions that support opportunities to change, provide disincentives for not changing, and challenge or restrict competing marketing

Campaign messages should be based on sound research of the target group and should be tested during campaign development

Outcomes should undergo rigorous independent assessment and peer-reviewed publication should be sought


For all the reasons described above, isolation of the independent effects of mass media campaigns is difficult. Substantial evidence has, however, been garnered from study designs that, in isolation, are less than classically excellent, but in aggregate yield a substantial body of support for the conclusion that mass media campaigns can change population health behaviours.

Search strategy and selection criteria

We searched Medline, PsychInfo, Embase, Soclit, Eric, and Communication and Mass Media Complete electronic databases to identify full-text review articles and non-reviewed notable studies published from 1998 onwards, in English, that we judged to represent advances in assessment methods or substantial increments in knowledge. We integrated review findings with evidence from robust and influential empirical studies that were published after the last review article identified.

Search terms included “review” and either “health promotion”, “health education”, “social marketing”, “marketing of health services”, “campaign*”, “mass media*”, “mass communication campaign*”, “publicity campaign*”, “information campaign*”, or “community intervention*”, along with and the individual health behaviours of interest, which we termed “tobacco or smoking”, “alcohol”, “marijuana“, “street drugs”, “crack cocaine”, “heart health or heart disease prevention or physical activity or obesity or nutrition or high fat* or high sodium* or diet”, “family planning or contraception or child spacing”, “sex or sexual behaviour”, “HIV or AIDS or HIV/AIDS or sexually transmitted disease or STD”, “skin neoplasms or sunburn or sunscreening agents”, “uterine cervical neoplasms”, “breast neoplasms”, “colorectal neoplasms”, “immunization or vaccination”, “diarrhea or diarrhoea or oral rehydration therapy or ORT or oral rehydration”, “breastfeed*”, “SIDS or sudden infant death syndrome or cot death”, “Reye's syndrome”, “organ donation”, “blood donation”, “domestic abuse or violence prevention or child abuse prevention”, “mental health or youth suicide prevention or depression”, or “seat belt use or road safety”.



All authors participated in the preparation of this Review and have seen and approved the final version.


Conflicts of interest 

We declare that we have no conflicts of interest.



MAW is supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Principal Research Fellowship. RCH is supported by a grant from the US National Cancer InstituteP20-CA095856-06. We thank Susan Mello and Judith Stanke for assistance in literature searches.


1 Kotler P, Lee NR. Social Marketing: influencing behaviors for good. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2008.

2 Hornik R, Yanovitzky I. Using theory to design evaluations of communication campaigns: the case of the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign. Commun Theory 2003; 13: 204-224. PubMed

3 Fishbein M, Azjen I. Predicting and changing behaviour: the reasoned action approach. New York: Psychology Press, 2010.

4 Farquhar JW. The community-based model of life style intervention trials. Am J Epidemiol 1978; 108: 103-111. PubMed

5 Fortmann SP, Haskell WL, Williams PT, Varady AN, Hulley SB, Farquhar JW. Community surveillance of cardiovascular diseases in the Stanford Five-City Project. Methods and initial experience. Am J Epidemiol 1986; 123: 656-669. PubMed

6 Hornik R, Jacobsohn L, Orwin R, Piesse A, Kalton G. Effects of the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign on youths. Am J Public Health 2008; 98: 2229-2236. CrossRef | PubMed

7 Hornik R. Evaluation design for public health communication programs. In: Hornik RC, ed. Public Health Communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002: 385-408.

8 Frieden TR, Bloomberg MR. How to prevent 100 million deaths from tobacco. Lancet 2007; 369: 1758-1761. Full Text | PDF(71KB) | CrossRef | PubMed

9 Jha P, Peto R, Zatonski W, Boreham J, Jarvis MJ, Lopez AD. Social inequalities in male mortality, and in male mortality from smoking: indirect estimation from national death rates in England and Wales, Poland, and North America. Lancet 2006; 368: 367-370. Summary | Full Text | PDF(80KB) | CrossRef | PubMed

10 National Cancer Institute. The role of the media in promoting and reducing tobacco use. Tobacco Control Monograph No 19. NIH Pub No 07-6242. Bethesda, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, 2008.

11 Bala M, Strzeszynski L, Cahill K. Mass media interventions for smoking cessation in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; 1. CD004704. PubMed

12 Wakefield MA, Durkin S, Spittal MJ, et al. Impact of tobacco control policies and mass media campaigns on monthly adult smoking prevalence. Am J Public Health 2008; 98: 1443-1450. CrossRef | PubMed

13 Farrelly MC, Nonnemaker J, Davis KC, Hussin A. The influence of the national truth campaign on smoking initiation. Am J Prev Med 2009; 36: 379-384. CrossRef | PubMed

14 Durkin S, Biener L, Wakefield M. Effects of different types of antismoking ads on reducing disparities in smoking cessation among socioeconomic subgroups. Am J Public Health 2009; 99: 2217-2223. CrossRef | PubMed

15 Sly DF, Arheart K, Dietz N, et al. The outcome consequences of defunding the Minnesota youth tobacco-use prevention program. Prev Med 2005; 41: 503-510. CrossRef | PubMed

16 Niederdeppe J, Farrelly MC, Hersey JC, Davis KC. Consequences of dramatic reductions in state tobacco control funds: Florida, 1998—2000. Tob Control 2008; 17: 205-210. CrossRef | PubMed

17 Niederdeppe J, Kuang X, Crock B, Skelton A. Media campaigns to promote smoking cessation among socioeconomically disadvantaged populations: What do we know, what do we need to learn, and what should we do now?. Soc Sci Med 2008; 67: 1343-1355. CrossRef | PubMed

18 Bricker JB, Leroux BJ, Petersen AV, et al. Nine-year prospective relationship between potential smoking cessation and children's daily smoking. Addiction 2003; 98: 585-593. CrossRef | PubMed

19 Pechman C, Reibling ET. Antismoking advertisements for youths: an independent evaluation of health, counteradvertising and industry approaches. Am J Public Health 2006; 96: 906-913. CrossRef | PubMed

20 Farrelly MC, Healton CG, Davis KC, Messeri P, Hersey JC, Haviland ML. Getting to the truth: evaluating national tobacco countermarketing campaigns. Am J Public Health 2002; 92: 901-907. CrossRef | PubMed

21 Wakefield M, Terry-McElrath Y, Emery S, et al. Effect of televised, tobacco company-funded smoking prevention advertising on youth smoking-related beliefs, intentions, and behavior. Am J Public Health 2006; 96: 2154-2160. CrossRef | PubMed

22 Rehm J, Mathers C, Popova S, Thavorncharoensap M, Teerawattananon Y, Patra J. Global burden of disease and injury and economic cost attributable to alcohol use and alcohol-use disorders. Lancet 2009; 373: 2223-2233. Summary | Full Text | PDF(270KB) | CrossRef | PubMed

23 Babor T, Caetano R, Casserwell S, et al. Alcohol: no ordinary commodity. New York, NY: World Health Organisation and Oxford University Press, 2003.

24 Spoth R, Greenberg M, Turrisi R. Preventive interventions addressing underage drinking: state of the evidence and steps toward public health impact. Pediatrics 2008; 121 (suppl 4): S311-S336. CrossRef | PubMed

25 Anderson P, Chisholm D, Fuhr DC. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of policies and programmes to reduce the harm caused by alcohol. Lancet 2009; 373: 2234-2246. Summary | Full Text | PDF(177KB) | CrossRef | PubMed

26 Moreira MT, Smith LA, Foxcroft D. Social norms interventions to reduce alcohol misuse in university or college students. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; 3. CD006748. PubMed

27 DeJong W, Atkin CK, Wallack L. A critical analysis of “moderation” advertising sponsored by the beer industry: are “responsible drinking” commercials done responsibly?. Millbank Q 1992; 70: 661-678. PubMed

28 Smith SW, Atkin CK, Roznowski J. Are “drink responsibly” alcohol campaigns strategically ambiguous?. Health Commun 2006; 20: 1-11. CrossRef | PubMed

29 Block LG, Morwitz VG, Putsis WP, Sen SK. Assessing the impact of antidrug advertising on adolescent drug consumption: results from a behavioral economic model. Am J Public Health 2002; 92: 1346-1351. CrossRef | PubMed

30 Erceg-Hurn DM. Drugs, money, and graphic ads: a critical review of the Montana Meth Project. Prev Sci 2008; 9: 256-263. CrossRef | PubMed

31 Palmgreen P, Lorch EP, Stephenson MT, Hoyle RH, Donohew L. Effects of the Office of National Drug Control Policy's Marijuana Initiative Campaign on high-sensation-seeking adolescents. Am J Public Health 2007; 97: 1644-1649. CrossRef | PubMed

32 Longshore D, Ghosh-Dastidar B, Ellickson PL. National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign and school-based drug prevention: evidence for a synergistic effect in ALERT Plus. Addict Behav 2006; 31: 496-508. CrossRef | PubMed

33 Orwin R, Cadell D, Chu A, et al. Evaluation of the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign: 2004 Report of Findings. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 2006.

34 Pomerleau J, Lock K, Knai C, McKee M. Interventions designed to increase adult fruit and vegetable intake can be effective: a systematic review of the literature. J Nutr 2005; 135: 2486-2495. PubMed

35 Matson-Koffman DM, Brownstein JN, Neiner JA, Greaney ML. A site-specific literature review of policy and environmental interventions that promote physical activity and nutrition for cardiovascular health: what works?. Am J Health Promot 2005; 19: 167-193. PubMed

36 Huhman ME, Potter LD, Duke JC, Judkins DR, Heitzler CD, Wong FL. Evaluation of a national physical activity intervention for children: VERB™ campaign, 2002—2004. Am J Prev Med 2007; 32: 38-43. CrossRef | PubMed

37 Economos CD, Hyatt RR, Goldberg JP, et al. A community intervention reduces BMI z-score in children: Shape Up Somerville first year results. Obesity 2007; 15: 1325-1336. PubMed

38 Sanigorski AM, Bell AC, Kremer PJ, Cuttler R, Swinburn BA. Reducing unhealthy weight gain in children through community capacity-building: results of a quasi-experimental intervention program, Be Active Eat Well. Int J Obes 2008; 32: 1060-1067. CrossRef | PubMed

39 Shea S, Basch CE. A review of five major community-based cardiovascular disease prevention programs. Part II: intervention strategies, evaluation methods, and results. Am J Health Promot 1990; 4: 279-287. PubMed

40 Atienza AA, King AC. Community-based health intervention trials: an overview of methodological issues. Epidemiol Rev 2002; 24: 72-79. CrossRef | PubMed

41 Roccella EJ. The contributions of public health education toward the reduction of cardiovascular disease mortality: experiences from the National High Blood Pressure Education Program. In: Hornik RC, ed. Public Health Communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002: 73-83.

42 Snyder LB, Hamilton MA, Mitchell EW, Kiwanuka-Tondo J, Fleming-Milici F, Proctor D. A meta-analysis of the effect of mediated health communication campaigns on behavior change in the United States. J Health Commun 2004; 9 (suppl 1): 71-96. CrossRef | PubMed

43 Brownson RC, Haire-Joshu D, Luke DA. Shaping the context of health: a review of environmental and policy approaches in the prevention of chronic diseases. Annu Rev Public Health 2006; 27: 341-370. CrossRef | PubMed

44 Reger B, Wootan MG, Booth-Butterfield S. A comparison of different approaches to promote community-wide dietary change. Am J Prev Med 2000; 18: 271-275. CrossRef | PubMed

45 Cavill N, Bauman A. Changing the way people think about health-enhancing physical activity: do mass media campaigns have a role?. J Sports Sci 2004; 22: 771-790. CrossRef | PubMed

46 Marcus BH, Williams DM, Dubbert PM, et al. Physical activity intervention studies: what we know and what we need to know: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Subcommittee on Physical Activity); Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young; and the Interdisciplinary Working Group on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Circulation 2006; 114: 2739-2752. CrossRef | PubMed

47 Kahn EB, Ramsey LT, Brownson RC, et al. The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity. A systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2002; 22 (suppl 4): 73-107. CrossRef | PubMed

48 Williams DM, Matthews CE, Rutt C, Napolitano MA, Marcus BH. Interventions to increase walking behavior. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008; 40 (suppl 7): S567-S573. CrossRef | PubMed

49 Finlay SJ, Faulkner G. Physical activity promotion through the mass media: inception, production, transmission and consumption. Prev Med 2005; 40: 121-130. CrossRef | PubMed

50 Norman GJ, Zabinski MF, Adams MA, Rosenberg DE, Yaroch AL, Atienza AA. A review of eHealth interventions for physical activity and dietary behavior change. Am J Prev Med 2007; 33: 336-345. CrossRef | PubMed

51 French SA, Story M, Jeffery RW. Environmental influences on eating and physical activity. Annu Rev Public Health 2001; 22: 309-335. CrossRef | PubMed

52 Emery SL, Szczypka G, Powell LM, Chaloupka FJ. Public health obesity-related TV advertising: lessons learned from tobacco. Am J Prev Med 2007; 33 (suppl 4): S257-S263. CrossRef | PubMed

53 Piotrow PT, Kincaid DL, Rimon JG, Rinehart W. Health Communication: Lessons from family planning and reproductive health. Westport, CA: Greenwood Publishing Group, 1997.

54 Bertrand JT, O'Reilly K, Denison J, Anhang R, Sweat M. Systematic review of the effectiveness of mass communication programs to change HIV/AIDS-related behaviors in developing countries. Health Educ Res 2006; 21: 567-597. CrossRef | PubMed

55 Wellings K. Evaluating AIDS public education in Europe; a cross-national comparison. In: Hornik R, ed. Public Health Communication: Evidence for Behavior Change. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002: 131-146.

56 Cleland J, Bernstein S, Ezeh A, Faundes A, Glasier A, Innis J. Family planning: the unfinished agenda. Lancet 2006; 368: 1810-1827. Summary | Full Text | PDF(175KB) | CrossRef | PubMed

57 Hornik R, McAnany E. Mass media and fertility change. In: Casterline J, ed. Diffusion processes and fertility transition: Selected perspectives. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001: 208-239.

58 Cleland J, Ali MM. Sexual abstinence, contraception, and condom use by young African women: a secondary analysis of survey data. Lancet 2006; 368: 1788-1793. Summary | Full Text | PDF(138KB) | CrossRef | PubMed

59 Noar SM, Palmgreen P, Chabot M, Dobransky N, Zimmerman RS. A 10-year systematic review of HIV/AIDS mass communication campaigns: Have we made progress?. J Health Commun 2009; 14: 15-42. CrossRef | PubMed

60 Myhre SL, Flora JA. HIV/AIDS communication campaigns: progress and prospects. J Health Commun 2000; 5 (suppl): 29-45. CrossRef | PubMed

61 Baron RC, Rimer BK, Breslow RA, et al. Client-directed interventions to increase community demand for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2008; 35 (suppl 1): S34-S55. CrossRef | PubMed

62 Marcus AC, Crane LA. A review of cervical cancer screening intervention research: implications for public health programs and future research. Prev Med 1998; 27: 13-31. CrossRef | PubMed

63 Black ME, Yamada J, Mann V. A systematic literature review of the effectiveness of community-based strategies to increase cervical cancer screening. Can J Public Health 2002; 93: 386-393. PubMed

64 Mullins R, Wakefield M, Broun K. Encouraging the right women to attend for cervical cancer screening: results from a targeted television campaign in Victoria, Australia. Health Educ Res 2008; 23: 477-486. CrossRef | PubMed

65 Pasick RJ, Hiatt RA, Paskett ED. Lessons learned from community-based cancer screening intervention research. Cancer 2004; 101 (suppl 5): 1146-1164. CrossRef | PubMed

66 Anderson JO, Mullins RM, Siahpush M, Spittal MJ, Wakefield M. Mass media campaign improves cervical screening across all socio-economic groups. Health Educ Res 2009; 24: 867-875. CrossRef | PubMed

67 Saraiya M, Glanz K, Briss PA, et al. Interventions to prevent skin cancer by reducing exposure to ultraviolet radiation: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2004; 27: 422-466. CrossRef | PubMed

68 Elwood JM, Makin JK, Sinclair CA, Burton RC. Melanoma prevention and screening. In: Balch CM, Houghton AN, Sober AJ, Soong S-j, Atkins MB, Thompson JF, eds. Cutaneous Melanoma. St Louis, MO: Quality Medical Publishing Inc, 2009: 107-132.

69 Dobbinson SJ, Wakefield MA, Jamsen KM, et al. Weekend sun protection and sunburn in Australia trends (1987—2002) and association with SunSmart television advertising. Am J Prev Med 2008; 34: 94-101. CrossRef | PubMed

70 Hill D, Marks R. Health promotion programs for melanoma prevention: screw or spring?. Arch Dermatol 2008; 144: 538-540. CrossRef | PubMed

71 Jones G, Steketee RW, Black RE, Bhutta ZA, Morris SS. How many child deaths can we prevent this year?. Lancet 2003; 362: 65-71. Summary | Full Text | PDF(105KB) | CrossRef | PubMed

72 Black RE, Morris SS, Bryce J. Where and why are 10 million children dying every year?. Lancet 2003; 361: 2226-2234. Summary | Full Text | PDF(3114KB) | CrossRef | PubMed

73 Hornik R, McDivitt J, Zimicki S, et al. Communication in support of child survival: evidence and explanations from eight countries. In: Hornik R, ed. Public Health Communication: Evidence for Behavior Change. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002: 219-250.

74 Zimicki S, Hornik RC, Verzosa CC, et al. Improving vaccination coverage in urban areas through a health communication campaign: the 1990 Philippine experience. Bull World Health Organ 1994; 72: 409-422. PubMed

75 Hutchinson P, Lance P, Guilkey DK, Shahjahan M, Haque S. Measuring the cost-effectiveness of a national health communication program in rural Bangladesh. J Health Commun 2006; 11 (suppl 2): 91-121. CrossRef | PubMed

76 Pegurri E, Fox-Rushby JA, Damian W. The effects and costs of expanding the coverage of immunisation services in developing countries: a systematic literature review. Vaccine 2005; 23: 1624-1635. CrossRef | PubMed

77 Waisbord S, Larson H. Why invest in communication for immunization: Evidence and lessons learned. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health/Centre for Communication Programs: Health Communication Partnership, 2005. and New York, NY: the United Nations Children's Fund

78 Wilmoth TA, Elder JP. An assessment of research on breastfeeding promotion strategies in developing countries. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41: 579-594. CrossRef | PubMed

79 McDivitt JA, Zimicki S, Hornik R, Abulaban A. The impact of the Healthcom mass media campaign on timely initiation of breastfeeding in Jordan. Stud Fam Plann 1993; 24: 295-309. CrossRef | PubMed

80 Thompson ME, Harutyunyan TL. Impact of a community-based integrated management of childhood illnesses (IMCI) programme in Gegharkunik, Armenia. Health Policy Plan 2009; 24: 101-107. CrossRef | PubMed

81 Hauck FR, Tanabe KO. International trends in sudden infant death syndrome: stabilization of rates requires further action. Pediatrics 2008; 122: 660-666. CrossRef | PubMed

82 Soumerai SB, Ross-Degnan D, Kahn JS. Effects of professional and media warnings about the association between aspirin use in children and Reye's syndrome. Milbank Q 1992; 70: 155-182. CrossRef | PubMed

83 Morrison DS, Petticrew M, Thomson H. What are the most effective ways of improving population health through transport interventions? Evidence from systematic reviews. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003; 57: 327-333. PubMed

84 Elder RW, Shults RA, Sleet DA, Nichols JL, Thompson RS, Rajab W. Effectiveness of mass media campaigns for reducing drinking and driving and alcohol-involved crashes: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2004; 27: 57-65. CrossRef | PubMed

85 Ditter SM, Elder RW, Shults RA, Sleet DA, Compton R, Nichols JL. Effectiveness of designated driver programs for reducing alcohol-impaired driving: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2005; 28 (suppl 5): 280-287. CrossRef | PubMed

86 Dinh-Zarr TB, Sleet DA, Shults RA, et al. Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to increase the use of safety belts. Am J Prev Med 2001; 21 (suppl 4): 48-65. CrossRef | PubMed

87 Williams AF, Reinfurt D, Wells JK. Increasing seat belt use in North Carolina. J Safety Res 1996; 27: 33-41. CrossRef | PubMed

88 Salzberg PM, Moffat JM. Ninety five percent: an evaluation of law, policy, and programs to promote seat belt use in Washington state. J Safety Res 2004; 35: 215-222. CrossRef | PubMed

89 Slapak M. The effect of The World Transplant Games on transplant rates in five continents. Ann Transplant 2004; 9: 46-50. PubMed

90 Morgan SE. The intersection of conversation, cognitions, and campaigns: The social representation of organ donation. Commun Theory 2009; 19: 29-48. PubMed

91 Adams V, Erwin K, Le PV. Public health works: blood donation in urban China. Soc Sci Med 2009; 68: 410-418. CrossRef | PubMed

92 Allain JP, Sarkodie F, Boateng P, Asenso K, Kyeremateng E, Owusu-Ofori S. A pool of repeat blood donors can be generated with little expense to the blood center in sub-Saharan Africa. Transfusion 2008; 48: 735-741. CrossRef | PubMed

93 Dodge KA. Framing public policy and prevention of chronic violence in American youths. Am Psychol 2008; 63: 573-590. CrossRef | PubMed

94 Swaim RC, Kelly K. Efficacy of a randomized trial of a community and school-based anti-violence media intervention among small-town middle school youth. Prev Sci 2008; 9: 202-214. CrossRef | PubMed

95 Mikton C, Butchart A. Child maltreatment prevention: a systematic review of reviews. Bull World Health Organ 2009; 87: 353-361. CrossRef | PubMed

96 Prinz RJ, Sanders MR, Shapiro CJ, Whitaker DJ, Lutzker JR. Population-based prevention of child maltreatment: the U.S. Triple p system population trial. Prev Sci 2009; 10: 1-12. CrossRef | PubMed

97 Potter SJ, Moynihan MM, Stapleton JG, Banyard VL. Empowering bystanders to prevent campus violence against women: a preliminary evaluation of a poster campaign. Violence Against Women 2009; 15: 106-121. CrossRef | PubMed

98 Mann JJ, Apter A, Bertolote J, et al. Suicide prevention strategies: a systematic review. J Am Med Assoc 2005; 294: 2064-2074. PubMed

99 Finn JC, Bett JH, Shilton TR, Cunningham C, Thompson PL. Patient delay in responding to symptoms of possible heart attack: can we reduce time to care?. Med J Aust 2007; 187: 293-298. PubMed

100 Noar SM. A 10-year retrospective of research in health mass media campaigns: where do we go from here?. J Health Commun 2006; 11: 21-42. CrossRef | PubMed

101 Abroms LC, Maibach EW. The effectiveness of mass communication to change public behavior. Annu Rev Public Health 2008; 29: 219-234. CrossRef | PubMed

102 Kotler P, Armstrong G. Principles of Marketing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2009.

103 Wallack L, Dorfman L. Media advocacy: A strategy for advancing policy and promoting health. Health Educ Q 1996; 23: 293-317. PubMed

Uncited reference

104 Randolph W, Viswanath K. Lessons learned from public health mass media campaigns: marketing health in a crowded media world. Ann Rev Public Health 2004; 25: 419-437. PubMed

a Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Carlton, Australia

b Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneappolis, MN, USA

c Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Correspondence to: Prof Melanie A Wakefield, Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, 1 Rathdowne Street, Carlton, VIC, Australia 3053